IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404387.html

The Impact of China's New Rural Pension Scheme on Farmland Transfer: From Relational Exchanges to Formal Market Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jingna

Abstract

Can a public pension change how rural households transfer farmland? We study China’s New Rural Pension Scheme (NRPS), exploiting its age-60 eligibility threshold in a fuzzy regressiondiscontinuity design applied to three waves of the China Family Panel Studies (2014–2018), with identification coming from individual older-member pension receipt. Pension receipt raises the probability that a household rents out farmland, and the response is concentrated entirely on market-oriented transfer: paid rental-out rises sharply while zero-rent rental-out, a proxy for nonmonetized relational transfer, does not move. The market-side response is largest among households with the weakest cultural and structural ties to kin and village, for whom relational transfer carries the lowest implicit cost. The estimates are robust to controls for child remittance, off-farm labor, and non-farm income, and we find no contemporaneous discontinuity in private kin transfers. Pension income thus does more than relax the household budget: it shifts the institutional form of land transfer from relational support toward market-oriented exchange. Social insurance, in this setting, operates as a land-market institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jingna, 2026. "The Impact of China's New Rural Pension Scheme on Farmland Transfer: From Relational Exchanges to Formal Market Contracts," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404387, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404387
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404387/files/177482_197103_115232_JingnaZhang_AAEA2026_148263.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.