IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404379.html

Who Do We Trust? Disentangling the Roles of Institutional Trust in Sustainability and Precision Agriculture Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Chenyu
  • Downey, W.
  • Keshavarz, Masie

Abstract

Sustainability adoption in agriculture is often modeled as a binary decision; however, emerging evidence suggests that adoption may instead occur through multiple stages. This thesis examines heterogeneity in sustainability adoption pathways among commercial farmers by distinguishing between interest in adoption and commitment to sustained implementation. Using survey data from commercial producers, ordered and binary regression models are employed to identify economic, strategic, operational, and behavioral determinants of both stages. Results indicate that perceived economic benefits and strategic positioning are strong predictors at both stages of the adoption pathway. Policy incentives, including both government financial support and perceived consumer willingness to pay, predict initial interest but lose explanatory power at the commitment stage. In contrast, perceived financial constraints do not deter initial interest but significantly reduce the probability of transitioning from interest to commitment. Demographic characteristics such as age, education, and gender exhibit limited explanatory power, while farm size shows selective effects at the interest stage. The findings reveal an “adoption puzzle”: while many producers recognize the economic rationale for sustainability, fewer fully integrate these practices into long-term farm management systems. This divergence suggests that sustainability adoption is not a single decision but a multi-stage process shaped by differing economic incentives and structural constraints. The study contributes to the literature by reframing sustainability adoption as a dynamic pathway rather than a binary outcome and by identifying distinct determinants at different stages of engagement. Policy and industry strategies that focus solely on stimulating initial interest may overestimate durable transformation unless they also address implementation risk, uncertainty, and long-term integration incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Chenyu & Downey, W. & Keshavarz, Masie, 2026. "Who Do We Trust? Disentangling the Roles of Institutional Trust in Sustainability and Precision Agriculture Adoption," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404379, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404379
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404379/files/177480_197073_115232_SustainabilityAAEA_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.