Author
Listed:
- Mastrianni, Morgan
- Atkinson, Sarah
- Fiechter, Chad
Abstract
In 2024, the Farm Service Agency (FSA) helped generate $2.25 billion in agricultural credit through their Guaranteed Farm Loan Program (FLP)s. One key stipulation of the FSA Guaranteed FLPs is that banks cannot obtain a guarantee for loans issued over a certain principal amount. A share of all FSA Guaranteed Farm Ownership Loans have been issued at the maximum lending limit since 2012. This study uses FSA data on guaranteed loans issued by commercial and Farm Credit System (FCS) lending institutions. We show that the lending limit have heterogeneous impacts across loan, lender, and borrower types, regions, and years. These results help us understand how different producers would be affected by the The $3.5 million guaranteed lending limit proposed by the PACE Act (Reps. Finstad, Craig, Sens. Hoeven, Klobuchar Reintroduce Legislation Modernizing Loan Limits for Ag Producers, 2025). We show that an increase in the maximum lending limit would relieve much of the excess credit demanded from borrowers. However, we estimate that a smaller increase would also significantly reduce the credit constraints faced by borrowers who take out loans at the maximum lending limit. The FSA is a critical player in agricultural credit markets for beginning farmers and ranchers, and yet the effect of its Guaranteed Farm Loan Programs’ maximum loan limits on the supply of agricultural credit has not been previously researched. This study will inform FSA and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policymakers of the role that lending limits have on demand for guaranteed farm loans and highlight the potential for these programs to further expand access to credit for eligible borrowers.
Suggested Citation
Mastrianni, Morgan & Atkinson, Sarah & Fiechter, Chad, 2026.
"Bunching Around FSA's Guaranteed Farm Loan Program's Lending Limits,"
2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri
404345, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aaea26:404345
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404345
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.