IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404332.html

The Efficiency Effects of Consolidation in the Farm Credit System

Author

Listed:
  • Strine, Joshua
  • Fiechter, Chad
  • Kuethe, Todd

Abstract

Between 2002 and 2023, 37 mergers occurred among Farm Credit System (FCS) agricultural credit associations (ACAs). We examine the effect of these mergers on ACA technical efficiency and financial performance using a window data envelopment analysis followed by a second-stage stacked difference-in-differences framework. We find no significant improvement in technical efficiency following consolidation. However, mergers yield different benefits for the merging associations. The smaller ACAs in the mergers reduce their bank efficiency ratios by 9.8–9.9 percentage points, a 34 percent reduction in the average ACA bank efficiency ratio, indicating they have less non-interest expense per dollar of income. Larger ACAs in the mergers increase their net interest margin by 0.12 percentage points, a 4 percent increase relative to the average ACA net interest margin, indicating a greater interest margin relative to their earning assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Strine, Joshua & Fiechter, Chad & Kuethe, Todd, 2026. "The Efficiency Effects of Consolidation in the Farm Credit System," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404332, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404332
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404332/files/177456_198600_115232_Strine_Fiechter_Kuethe_2026_AAEA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf, 2003. "Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 1070-1074.
    2. Collender, Robert N. & Nehring, Richard & Somwaru, Agapi, 1991. "Profit Efficiency of Farm Credit System Associations," Staff Reports 278606, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    4. Atakelty Hailu & Terrence S. Veeman, 2001. "Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 605-616.
    5. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    6. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Zhu, Joe, 2002. "Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 16-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Halkos & Nickolaos Tzeremes, 2014. "Measuring the effect of Kyoto protocol agreement on countries’ environmental efficiency in CO 2 emissions: an application of conditional full frontiers," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 367-382, June.
    2. Halkos, George E. & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2013. "A conditional directional distance function approach for measuring regional environmental efficiency: Evidence from UK regions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 182-189.
    3. Xionghe Qin & Yanming Sun, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Environmental–Economic Efficiency and Driving Forces behind Efficiency Improvement in China: A Multistage Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Kenneth Rødseth, 2014. "Efficiency measurement when producers control pollutants: a non-parametric approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 211-223, October.
    5. Yuanxiang Zhou & Shan Wang & Shuqi Xu & Qingyuan Zhu, 2025. "Big data in data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs based on simulation and environmental-health matching data of Chinese industrial enterprises," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(1), pages 279-298, May.
    6. Shen, Zhiyang & Bai, Kaixuan & Hong, Tianyang & Balezentis, Tomas, 2021. "Evaluation of carbon shadow price within a non-parametric meta-frontier framework: The case of OECD, ASEAN and BRICS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Gabriella De Bernardo & Gennaro Punzo & Rosalia Castellano, 2026. "Tackling negative externalities in well-being efficiency analysis: accounting for socio-economic and environmental costs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Wang, Ke & Huang, Wei & Wu, Jie & Liu, Ying-Nan, 2014. "Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 5-20.
    9. Lucas Assunção & Andréa Cynthia Santos & Thiago F. Noronha & Rafael Andrade, 2021. "Improving logic-based Benders' algorithms for solving min-max regret problems," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(2), pages 23-57.
    10. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    11. Zhongfei Chen & Stavros Kourtzidis & Panayiotis Tzeremes & Nickolaos Tzeremes, 2022. "A robust network DEA model for sustainability assessment: an application to Chinese Provinces," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 235-262, March.
    12. Zhang, Junfeng & Fang, Hong & Wang, Hongxia & Jia, Mingshun & Wu, Junjie & Fang, Siran, 2017. "Energy efficiency of airlines and its influencing factors: A comparison between China and the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    14. K Hervé Dakpo & Philippe Jeanneaux & Laure Latruffe, 2014. "Inclusion of undesirable outputs in production technology modeling:The case of greenhouse gas emissions in French meat sheep farming," Working Papers SMART 14-08, INRAE UMR SMART.
    15. Wang, Derek D. & Ren, Yaoyao, 2024. "Accuracy of Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Undesirable Outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 596-612.
    16. George Halkos & George Papageorgiou, 2016. "Spatial environmental efficiency indicators in regional waste generation: a nonparametric approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 62-78, January.
    17. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Kazemi Matin, Reza & Yadollahi, Amir Hossein, 2024. "Stochastic resource reallocation in two-stage production processes with undesirable outputs: An empirical study on the power industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Chu, Junfei & Shao, Caifeng & Emrouznejad, Ali & Wu, Jie & Yuan, Zhe, 2021. "Performance evaluation of organizations considering economic incentives for emission reduction: A carbon emission permit trading approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Yu Liu & Rui-tang Guo & Wei-guo Pan, 2024. "Evaluation of carbon emission efficiency and spatial relevance in the thermal power industry: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22715-22745, September.
    20. Roshdi, Israfil & Hasannasab, Maryam & Margaritis, Dimitris & Rouse, Paul, 2018. "Generalised weak disposability and efficiency measurement in environmental technologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1000-1012.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.