IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404329.html

Understanding How U.S. Farms Use Risk Management Tools to Mitigate Financial Stress and Reduce Farm Exit

Author

Listed:
  • Bafowaa, Bridget
  • Rabinowitz, Adam

Abstract

Financial stress remains persistent in U.S. agriculture, threatening the long-term viability of farm operations despite the availability of numerous risk management tools. While previous studies have examined the effectiveness of individual risk management strategies, less is known about how farmers use these tools either independently or in combination and whether these tools are associated with lower levels of financial stress. This study examines the combination of risk management tools used by different farmers and evaluates which bundle of tools are effective in alleviating financial stress. Using farm-level data from the USDA Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS), we employ the Latent Class Analysis (LCA) using indicators of participation in risk management strategies such as crop insurance, government support programs, and diversification strategies. The resulting clusters capture the distinct risk management portfolios farms use. An ordered logit model is then used to examine the association between risk management bundles and farm financial stress while controlling farm and operator characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Bafowaa, Bridget & Rabinowitz, Adam, 2026. "Understanding How U.S. Farms Use Risk Management Tools to Mitigate Financial Stress and Reduce Farm Exit," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404329, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404329
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404329/files/177456_192250_115232_2026_AAEA_Draft.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.