IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404315.html

A Dynamic Bioeconomic Model for Aquaponic Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Ziqing
  • Sawerengera, Jane
  • Wang, Jingjing

Abstract

In a rapidly growing world, conventional agriculture is under pressure from climate change and is struggling to meet the growing food demand while protecting the environment. Adopting new technologies like Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA), where farming is done in controlled environments shielded from external climate fluctuations, can ensure climate resilience. This paper develops a dynamic bioeconomic model of aquaponic production in which fish biomass is both a harvestable stock and a source of nutrients for plant production. The model links fish growth, waste generation, plant nutrient availability, fertilizer substitution, repeated plant harvests, and terminal fish harvest timing in a unified private-profit framework. The central mechanism is intertemporal: fish biomass evolves over a long production cycle, while leafy vegetables can be harvested repeatedly over shorter cycles. As fish biomass increases, fish-generated waste raises plant-available nutrients and can reduce the need for purchased fertilizer. A calibrated tilapia-kale application illustrates the model. In the baseline simulation, the profit-maximizing tilapia harvest occurs after approximately 262 days, while kale is harvested on a 27-day cycle. Repeated kale harvests generate revenue before the terminal fish harvest and therefore affect farm cash flow as well as fertilizer demand. Sensitivity analysis shows that fish profit is most responsive to biological growth conditions, especially temperature, and to revenue-side parameters such as fish price and harvestable-output share. Kale profit is driven primarily by crop price, harvestable yield, and production scale. The results show that the value of aquaponic integration depends not only on nutrient recycling, but also on the timing of biological growth, nutrient availability, and harvest decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Ziqing & Sawerengera, Jane & Wang, Jingjing, 2026. "A Dynamic Bioeconomic Model for Aquaponic Farms," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404315, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404315
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404315/files/171962_194940_115232_A_Dynamic_Bioeconomic_Model_for_Aquaponic_Farms.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    2. William P. Pierskalla & John A. Voelker, 1976. "A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 353-388, September.
    3. Mark E. Doms & Timothy Dunne, 1998. "Capital Adjustment Patterns in Manufacturing Plants," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(2), pages 409-429, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David L. Kaufman & Mark E. Lewis, 2007. "Machine maintenance with workload considerations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(7), pages 750-766, October.
    2. Fiona Sloothaak & Alp Akçay & Geert-Jan van Houtum & Matthieu van der Heijden, 2023. "After-Sales Services During an Asset’s Lifetime: Collaborative Planning of System Upgrades," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 212-232, September.
    3. Alireza Sabouri & Woonghee Tim Huh & Steven M. Shechter, 2017. "Screening Strategies for Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1131-1146, October.
    4. David T. Abdul‐Malak & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & Lisa M. Maillart, 2019. "Maintaining systems with heterogeneous spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 485-501, September.
    5. Yeek-Hyun Kim & Lyn Thomas, 2013. "Training and repair policies for stand-by systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 469-487, September.
    6. Retsef Levi & Thomas Magnanti & Yaron Shaposhnik, 2019. "Scheduling with Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 776-793, February.
    7. Collin Drent & Melvin Drent & Joachim Arts & Stella Kapodistria, 2023. "Real-Time Integrated Learning and Decision Making for Cumulative Shock Degradation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 235-253, January.
    8. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Wang, Wei & Wu, Zhiying & Xiong, Junlin & Xu, Yaofeng, 2018. "Redundancy optimization of cold-standby systems under periodic inspection and maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 394-402.
    10. Xiaodong Yao & Xiaolan Xie & Michael C. Fu & Steven I. Marcus, 2005. "Optimal joint preventive maintenance and production policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(7), pages 668-681, October.
    11. Steven M. Shechter & Matthew D. Bailey & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2008. "Replacing nonidentical vital components to extend system life," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 700-703, October.
    12. Lisa M. Maillart & Xiang Fang, 2006. "Optimal maintenance policies for serial, multi‐machine systems with non‐instantaneous repairs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 804-813, December.
    13. Frederico Belo & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2010. "Cross-sectional Tobin's Q," NBER Working Papers 16336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Raouf Boucekkine & David de la Croix & Omar Licandro, 2006. "Vintage Capital," Economics Working Papers ECO2006/8, European University Institute.
    15. Fabiano Rodrigues Bastos, 2007. "Organizational Capital, Learning-by-Doing and Investment Volatility," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 8(3), pages 463-475.
    16. Bena, Jan & Ondko, Peter, 2012. "Financial development and the allocation of external finance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25.
    17. Alsyouf, Imad, 2009. "Maintenance practices in Swedish industries: Survey results," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 212-223, September.
    18. Francois, P. & Lloyd-Ellis, H., 2003. "Co-movement, Capital and Contracts : 'Normal' Cycles Through Creative Destruction," Discussion Paper 2003-62, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    19. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Châtelet, Eric, 2012. "Integrating production, inventory and maintenance planning for a parallel system with dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 59-66.
    20. Sanjay Jain & Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Jean Pauphilet & Kamalini Ramdas, 2024. "Robust Combination Testing: Methods and Application to COVID-19 Detection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2661-2681, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.