IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404307.html

Environmental Constraints on the Adoption of Agricultural Spraying Drones: An Empirical Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Wenhao
  • Xu, Chenguang
  • Chao, Zenghui
  • Zhang, Jun

Abstract

This paper investigates how natural conditions affect agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) purchase intensity and model choice in China. Using administrative subsidy transaction records, county-level weather and terrain data, city-level economic controls, and county socioeconomic characteristics, the paper combines two empirical approaches. First, a zero-truncated Poisson model with correlated random effects estimates county-year purchase counts. Results show that terrain and precipitation exhibit nonlinear associations with purchase intensity, low temperatures are negatively associated, and net price is negatively associated. Second, a conditional logit model examines top-20 model choice among family farms and individual buyers. Subsidies significantly influence model choice, but this effect varies with local conditions: precipitation weakens the subsidy effect, whereas wind and high temperatures strengthen it. Policy simulations predict changes in model shares under no-subsidy, uniform subsidy increase, and condition-targeted scenarios relative to baseline. The findings imply that UAV subsidy design should account for geographic heterogeneity. Furthermore, product-choice models that exclude non-purchasers should be interpreted as capturing reallocations among existing models rather than changes in total adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Wenhao & Xu, Chenguang & Chao, Zenghui & Zhang, Jun, 2026. "Environmental Constraints on the Adoption of Agricultural Spraying Drones: An Empirical Study in China," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404307, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404307
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404307/files/Environmental%20Constraints%20on%20the%20Adoption%20of%20Agricultural%20Spraying%20Drones%20An%20Empirical%20Study%20in%20China%281%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.