IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404306.html

Agricultural Socialized Services and Fertilizer Reduction: Evidence from Smallholder Vegetable Production in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Zhexi
  • Luan, Jian
  • Wang, Ming
  • Xue, Li
  • Mu, Yueying
  • Gao, Yang

Abstract

mallholder agriculture accounts for a substantial share of global fertilizer use, yet farm-level constraints in capital, labor, and technical capacity continue to impede greener production. Agricultural socialized services have been proposed as an institutional pathway for relaxing these constraints, but the channels through which they affect input use remain incompletely understood. We develop an analytical framework that links multi-stage agricultural socialized services to three channels of fertilizer reduction—input precision, factor substitution, and value realization—and use micro-level survey data on 970 vegetable producers in four facility-vegetable provincial-level jurisdictions in China (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, and Shandong) to test the framework empirically. We find that the adoption of agricultural socialized services significantly reduces fertilizer application intensity, with the estimated effect robust to instrumenting for service adoption with village-level service development, median regression, sample restriction, and an alternative expenditure-based measure of adoption. Mechanism estimates indicate that mechanization services raise the adoption of soil testing and formula-based fertilization, field management services raise organic manure application, and marketing services raise farm-gate prices. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the fertilizer-reducing effect is concentrated among smallholders and older operators. These findings suggest that, in smallholder-dominated and aging agricultural systems, a service-based division of labor can advance green transformation without requiring large changes in land tenure.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Zhexi & Luan, Jian & Wang, Ming & Xue, Li & Mu, Yueying & Gao, Yang, 2026. "Agricultural Socialized Services and Fertilizer Reduction: Evidence from Smallholder Vegetable Production in China," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404306, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404306
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404306/files/Manuscript_replacement.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Sun Ling & Hoppe, Robert A. & Hertz, Thomas & Xu, Shicong, "undated". "Farm Labor, Human Capital, and Agricultural Productivity in the United States," USDA Miscellaneous 323858, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Guo, Zhangdong & Chen, Xiaoqi & Zhang, Yongwang, 2022. "Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers' agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Knowler, Duncan & Bradshaw, Ben, 2007. "Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-48, February.
    4. Konstantinos Giannakas, 2002. "Information Asymmetries and Consumption Decisions in Organic Food Product Markets," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(1), pages 35-50, March.
    5. Shuqin Jin & Bin Zhang & Bi Wu & Dongmei Han & Yu Hu & Chenchen Ren & Chuanzhen Zhang & Xun Wei & Yan Wu & Arthur P. J. Mol & Stefan Reis & Baojing Gu & Jie Chen, 2021. "Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 48-55, January.
    6. Yuying Liu & Kaiyao Shi & Ziqi Liu & Ling Qiu & Yan Wang & Hao Liu & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "The Effect of Technical Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Adoption of Organic Fertilizers in China: Based on the Mediation Role of Ability and Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fateh Mamine & Noure El Imène Boumali & Etienne Montaigne, 2020. "Why Farmers Adopt Agro-Industrial By-Products in Animal Feed? Lesson Learned in Algerian Case," Post-Print hal-02966547, HAL.
    2. Geussens, K. & Van den Broeck, G. & Vanderhaegen, K. & Verbist, B. & Maertens, M., 2019. "Farmers’ perspectives on payments for ecosystem services in Uganda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 316-327.
    3. Rico Kongsager, 2018. "Linking Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: A Review with Evidence from the Land-Use Sectors," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Katherine Shirriff & Krishna Bahadur KC & Aaron Berg, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Cover Crop Adoption and Soil Erosion Severity: A Case Study from the Simcoe Watershed, Ontario, Canada," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Tamini, Lota D., 2011. "A nonparametric analysis of the impact of agri-environmental advisory activities on best management practice adoption: A case study of Québec," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1363-1374, May.
    6. Ignacio Pérez Domínguez & Thomas Fellmann & Franz Weiss & Peter Witzke & Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé & Mihaly Himics & Torbjörn Jansson & Guna Salputra & Adrian Leip, 2016. "An economic assessment of GHG mitigation policy options for EU agriculture (EcAMPA 2)," JRC Research Reports JRC101396, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Chatzimichael Konstantinos & Daskalaki Charoula & Emvalomatis Grigorios & Tsagris Michail & Tzouvelekas Vangelis, 2025. "Factors shaping innovative behavior: A meta‐analysis of technology adoption studies in agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 73(1), pages 75-103, March.
    8. Magenge Deborah & Kyaruzi Athman & Nsenga, Justus, 2025. "Factors Influencing Tomato Farmers to Adopt Agricultural Technologies in Mlali Mvomero District, Tanzania," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 4325-4340, March.
    9. Schulze, Holger & Jahn, Gabriele & Spiller, Achim, 2008. "Institutional Change and Acceptance of Quality Assurance: The Case of Organic Farming in Germany," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6597, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    10. Pannell, David J. & Pardey, Philip G. & Hurley, Terrence M., "undated". "Private Incentives for Sustainable Agriculture: Principals and Evidence for Sustainable Agricultural Change," Working Papers 304700, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. Marilyn A. Muñoz Mayorga & Eva Iglesias Martínez & Natalia Caldés Gómez, 2017. "Jatropha Suppliers as Contributors to the Sustainability of the Production of Bioelectricity in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Burnett, J. Wesley & Szmurlo, Daniel & Callahan, Scott, 2024. "Farmland Rental and Conservation Practice Adoption," Economic Information Bulletin 341821, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Kaiser, Antonia & Wang, Yanbing & Klein, Noëlle & Mack, Gabriele & Ritzel, Christian, 2025. "Landscape features on farms: Evidence on factors influencing their quantity and ecological value," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. repec:bjc:journl:v:13:y:2026:i:3:p:1539-1556 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Damien Jourdain & Juliette Lairez & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 417-437, December.
    16. Marie Lassalas & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2024. "The technical and economic effects of biodiversity standards on wheat production," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 51(2), pages 275-308.
    17. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    18. Zimmermann, Andrea & Britz, Wolfgang, 2014. "European Farms’ Participation in Agri-environmental Measures," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183073, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Dependra Bhatta & Krishna P. Paudel & Kai Liu, 2023. "Factors influencing water conservation practices adoptions by Nepali farmers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10879-10901, October.
    20. Jellason, Nugun P. & Robinson, Elizabeth J. Z. & Ogbaga, Chukwuma C., 2021. "Agriculture 4.0: is sub-Saharan Africa ready?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113550, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Zabala, Aiora & Pascual, Unai & García-Barrios, Luis Enrique & Mukherjee, Nibedita, 2025. "Drivers to adopt agroforestry and sustainable land-use innovations: A review and framework for policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.