IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea14/170219.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Actions towards food safety: choosing labels or self-protection

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Shiwen
  • Chen, Yuan
  • Zeng, Yinchu

Abstract

This paper constructs a theoretical framework of consumers’ label-choosing and self-protection behaviors when meeting their demand for food safety. With data collected from a survey on vegetable consumers in Beijing, we employ a bivariate Tobit model to make empirical analyses. The results show that knowledge and non-wage income have positive effects on promoting consumers’ label-choosing and self-protection behaviors. Self-protection, compared to label-choosing is relatively more labor intensive, thus a higher wage rate will result a lower level of self-protection behavior due to relatively higher opportunity costs. Additionally, consumers of different ages will choose different ways to pursue food safety. The younger are inclined to purchasing more labeled vegetables while the elder tend to conduct a higher level of self-protection behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Shiwen & Chen, Yuan & Zeng, Yinchu, 2014. "Actions towards food safety: choosing labels or self-protection," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170219, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170219
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.170219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/170219/files/Actions%20towards%20food%20safety-%20choosing%20labels%20or%20self-protection.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.170219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Consumer/Household Economics; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Risk and Uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.