IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aes/icsrog/wpaper17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reconsidering The Social Responsibility Of Media Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Ducu

    (Centre for Advanced Research in Management and Applied Ethics, Romania)

  • Irina Stanciugelu

    (The National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, Romania)

Abstract

In 1947, the Hutchins Commission talked for the first time on the social responsibility of the press. It was 6 years before having the idea of social responsibility being applied to the work of company managers and companies themselves. According to the U.S. commission, this social responsibility consisted in the educational role of the press. Since 1947, not only the media channels and tools changed significantly, but also the profile of those that read, listen or watch to mass-media production. Based on the new realities of the 21st century press industry and the new profile of media audience, we attempt to redefine the concept of social responsibility for this particular type of organization. To show this reconsideration is viable, we analyze one media institution that leads the way in its industry, which is CNN. At the same time, we emphasize the idea that social responsibility of an organization is only one element of a broader concept of responsibility, of organizational responsibility, where the company is no longer understood from a bi-polar perspective (economic vs. social responsibilities).

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Ducu & Irina Stanciugelu, 2013. "Reconsidering The Social Responsibility Of Media Institutions," Social Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainable Business 17, Bucharest University of Economic Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:icsrog:wpaper:17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csrconferences.org/RePEc/aes/icsrog/2013/2013_2_008.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2013, September
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icsrog:wpaper:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.