IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aeg/report/2017-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stesura e Attuazione del Piano di Miglioramento:il Problema della Scelta del Metodo

Author

Listed:
  • Domenico Lembo

    (Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti (DIAG), University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy)

  • Mario Vacca

    (Ministero dell’Istruzione,dell’Università e della Ricerca)

  • Sara Zoccoli

    (Ministero dell’Istruzione,dell’Università e della Ricerca)

Abstract

The National Evaluation System (SNV) - Sistema Nazionale di Valutazione) makes available to schools the Self-Evaluation Report (RAV - Rapporto di Autovalutazione) and the improvement plan (PdM - Piano di Miglioramento), which are the tools that allows the schools to evaluate themselves in order to improve their services. The PdM aims at managing the Improvement Process, which starts from the contents of the RAV, and which is a real process including different phases: planning, development of actions, verification and documentation. As it always happens for the development and management of the processes, a problem is the choice of the methodology. Two methods have been proposed for the preparation and implementation of the PdM, a structured one and an unstructured one, based on agile models. In this paper, after a brief presentation of the two methods, we propose a comparison between them to facilitate the choice of educational institutions that face the onerous but challenging school improvement task.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenico Lembo & Mario Vacca & Sara Zoccoli, 2017. "Stesura e Attuazione del Piano di Miglioramento:il Problema della Scelta del Metodo," DIAG Technical Reports 2017-03, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    • Handle: RePEc:aeg:report:2017-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wwwold.dis.uniroma1.it/~bibdis/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=115&Itemid=34
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aeg:report:2017-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonietta Angelica Zucconi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dirosit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.