Author
Abstract
How did firms govern employee misconduct in the absence of strong courts, standardized accounting, and effective external enforcement? Existing accounts of corporate governance often treat formal law and bureaucratic control as preconditions for modern organizations. Drawing on extensive archival evidence from the Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank between 1915 and 1949, this article challenges that assumption by examining how a large, expanding bank constructed an effective internal system to prevent employee fraud under conditions of legal fragility and political instability. Conceptually, the study reframes fraud control as a historically contingent governance architecture composed of three interlocking elements: dense internal monitoring, incentive-based career structures, and a distinctive guarantor system that transferred risk to third parties while mobilizing social reputation, moral obligation, and private information. Rather than operating as an informal residue of tradition, the guarantor system functioned as a contractual and organizational device that embedded extra-organizational social relations into the bank’s formal governance structure. Based on regulations, personnel files, fraud case records, and contemporary publications, the article shows that these mechanisms were mutually reinforcing and capable of sustaining relatively low fraud incidence and high employee retention over time, though their effectiveness depended on macroeconomic stability. By historicizing corporate governance outside Western institutional settings, the study demonstrates that modern control did not require the elimination of informality but its strategic institutionalization. More broadly, it contributes to business history and the study of capitalism by revealing alternative pathways through which firms historically produced trust, discipline, and accountability in the absence of strong states.
Suggested Citation
Rixu Lan & Haowen Ma & Lingyu Kong, 2026.
"The Guardians Guarded: Preventing Employee Fraud in Chinese Modern Banks (1912–1949),"
Adelaide Economics Working Papers
2026-06 Classification-N2, Adelaide University, School of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:adl:wpaper:2026-06
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:2026-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chansik Yoon or Ruby Nguyen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decadau.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.