IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/wsi/wschap/9789812817839_0019.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Methods For Evaluation Of Institutional Benchmark In Health Care

In: Monitoring, Evaluating, Planning Health Services

Author

Listed:
  • C. DE VECCHIS

    (Resfirma s.r.l, Roma, Italy)

Abstract

In this work we will present methods and instruments for the evaluation of the Institutional Benchmark in Health Care and in every other field of public interventions. In particular we will see the methods for goal optimisation in a problem of resources allocation and the known methods for the definition of goal functions. We can define the Institutional Benchmark in a problem of resources as the ratio between the value obtained of the goal function and the maximum value that could be obtained using the same resources. In resources allocation problems there are n goals that are often conflicting with each other so we have to deal with a multiobjective optimisation. Moreover, the evaluation of the priority of one goal over another must be a political decision and must be taken by the political institutions. For this reason we have to speak of non-inferiority rather then optimality. There are different ways to define non-inferiority; we propose the concept of Pareto-optimality adapted to services. We will discuss the advantages that this definition of noninferiority can achieve. We will formulate the multiobjective programming defining the objective functions (utility functions) and the constraint functions. The hardest part of the work is to express the objective functions in terms of resources, that is, to define the functional link between the resources used and the objective achieved. We will spend part of this work presenting the available methods to generate the utility functions automatically from historical data and we will see advantages and disadvantages of each method. Once defined the multiobjective programming problem, we will recall the known methods available for solving it, in particular we will present the weights method and the constraints method. The utility functions will be in a non-analytical form so we will discuss briefly about methods dealing with this kind of functions. In particular we will see the advantages of genetic algorithms. We will conclude our work with a critical evaluation on an application in the local health care field, presenting our conclusions and suggesting future work.

Suggested Citation

  • C. De Vecchis, 1999. "Methods For Evaluation Of Institutional Benchmark In Health Care," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: V De Angelis & N Ricciardi & G Storchi (ed.), Monitoring, Evaluating, Planning Health Services, chapter 19, pages 210-218, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:wschap:9789812817839_0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789812817839_0019
    Download Restriction: Ebook Access is available upon purchase.

    File URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789812817839_0019
    Download Restriction: Ebook Access is available upon purchase.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:wschap:9789812817839_0019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscientific.com/page/worldscibooks .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.