What Can We Learn From The British Nuclear Power Experience?
In: The Uk Energy Experience A Model or A Warning?
AbstractNuclear power was always uneconomic in the UK, but under the old CEGB regime, this was largely concealed. Once negotiations to privatise nuclear power took place in 1988 and 1989, it became clear that nuclear power was too costly and too financially risky to be privatised in a competitive structure. In the last five years the public sector nuclear companies have achieved much improved financial results, almost entirely through a sharp increase in incomes consequent on making the AGRs work better. Serendipity rather than market forces is the predominant explanation for this improvement. In the attempt to privatise nuclear power again, lessons have been learned. It has finally become transparent that new nuclear investment remains unprofitable, and while it may be possible to sell the newer stations at a positive price, taxpayers and consumers will receive little from the very large investments and subsidies received by nuclear power over the years, and large unfunded liabilities will remain in the public sector
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. in its series World Scientific Book Chapters with number
9781848161030_0018.||Handle:|| RePEc:wsi:wschap:9781848161030_0018||Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.worldscientific.com/page/worldscibooks|
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:wschap:9781848161030_0018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tai Tone Lim)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.