Author
Abstract
Project portfolio management is the highest scope to view corporate projects. At the same time portfolios are quantifiable channels through which elements of a corporate strategy are delivered. Although there is a considerably evident path of expanding management methodologies from the ones focused on independent projects, through programmes to portfolios, application of portfolio standards is still insufficiently analysed by academia. Not only little has been revealed on the circumstances of launching project portfolio management in business environment, but there is also a gap in the knowledge on indicators of its successful implementation. On the basis of the scarce literature on the subject matter, the authors propose a hypothesis that the knowledge oriented approach toward adoption of portfolio management seems more effective than the process oriented one. The given assumptions are corroborated in the course of a case study of a company whose core business has the nature of continuous processes. However, all strategic changes into the internal and external operations are executed as projects. Thus, the company project maturity has reached the level at which the need for portfolio management methodology adoption becomes not only apparent, but also inevitable. The article has been inspired by a suggestion that there is no investigation into factors influencing fruitfulness of portfolio mechanisms introduction. It revises the existing publications on the issue and it contributes to the professional literature by giving real business examples of some of the assumptions and extending the current concepts into further hypotheses.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp15:417-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/proceedings/978-961-6914-13-0/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.