IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/mklp14/379.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Effects of Employee Tenure on Workplace Deception

Author

Listed:
  • Jerry Koehler

    (University of South Florida, USA)

  • Thomas W. Philippe

    (St. Petersburg College, USA)

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a study that tested two hypotheses predicting employees’ behaviour in the workplace. The study predicted that employee tenure was a significant variable affecting perception of workplace deception. The study also predicted that employees who have the highest tenure in the in the current workplace will significantly perceive more workplace deception as a common practice than those who have lower tenure. Further, the study predicted that employees with the highest tenure in the workplace wil perceive managers as being more deceptive than younger coworkers. A total of 216 questionnaires were administered via an online survey. 44.9% of the questionnaires were returned completed and consisted of 67% female and 33% male. The subject populations ages were 16.1% of the respondents stated they were between 18 and 24, 43.7% were between 25 and 34, for the ages of 35-44, the response rate was 28.7% and 11.4% were over 45, the range of 20 to over 55 years of age. The results of our study supported our hypotheses. The data confirmed that as time with employer increased, so did the perception of workplace deception. 58% of employee's with 7 or more years of tenure were agreed or strongly agreed that they perceive deception in the workplace as common. Also, there was a linear correlation with age and the perception that one's manager has been deceptive. 67% of employees surveyed indicated that they agree or strongly agree managers were perceived as deceptive, and 61% agreed or strongly agreed to have personally observed their manager being deceptive.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry Koehler & Thomas W. Philippe, 2014. "Effects of Employee Tenure on Workplace Deception," Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014,, ToKnowPress.
  • Handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp14:379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-09-3/papers/ML14-556.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-09-3/MakeLearn2014.pdf
    File Function: Conference Programme
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp14:379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/proceedings/978-961-6914-09-3/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.