IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book chapter

Relative Efficiency of Public Education in the New EUMember States: The Case of Primary Education

Listed author(s):
  • Aleksander Aristovnik

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Slovenia)

The purpose of the paper is to review some previous researches on the efficiency measurement of public (primary) education sector as well as some conceptual and methodological issues of nonparametric approach. Most importantly, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique is presented and then applied to the wide range of the EU and OECD countries, including new EU member states, to evaluate technical efficiency within the selected education sector in 1999-2009 period. The empirical results show that within a selected group of EU member states Denmark, Hungary and Portugal are seen as most efficient in primary education sector. The efficient countries are also Greece and Romania, however, their primary expenditures per student (in % of GDP) is very low and have averaged less than 12% (the EU/OECD average is 18.7% in the considered period). In addition, some countries come very close to the frontier (e.g. Czech R.), while the other countries are further away and therefore less efficient (e.g. Croatia). On the other hand, the least efficient countries are Belgium, Sweden and Croatia. Some less efficient countries should significantly decrease their input (primary expenditure per student) (e.g. Slovenia from 27.0% to 22.0%) and/or increase their outputs, i.e. school enrolment (e.g. Ireland and Poland), primary completion rate (Belgium) and teacher-pupil ratio (Ireland) in order to become efficient. In general, the new EU member states are relatively more efficient than non-EU countries in the sample, however, they show relatively low efficiency against the old EU-member states.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
File Function: Conference Programme
Download Restriction: no

in new window

This chapter was published in: Aleksander Aristovnik , , pages 237-243, 2013.
This item is provided by ToKnowPress in its series Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management & Innovation: Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2013 with number 237-243.
Handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp13:237-243
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp13:237-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alen Jezovnik)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.