IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book chapter

Informal Quality Assessment of Legal Services (by Citizens) in Slovenia

Listed author(s):
  • Benjamin Lesjak

    (International School of Social and Business Studies, Slovenia)

  • Dušan Lesjak

    (International School of Social and Business Studies, Slovenia)

Registered author(s):

    In the paper we described different approaches to quality assessment of legal services, which are provided by lawyers, notaries or other legal profession. Citizens have options to make a formal complaint about poorly delivered legal services. Complaint and possible restitution can hardly effect to the past, when damage was already done. In most cases inspection and supervision mechanisms are obtained by bar association, specialized boards or ombudsman. On the other hand, we experienced a lack of informal or so-called market supervision mechanisms, which could protect citizens from potential bad or mediocre legal services. Based on several prior studies and statistical data we found out that formal supervision mechanisms might lack effectiveness. Therefore we proposed criteria of SERQUAL evaluation for legal service quality assessment and development of a publically available web portal for rating legal service providers with strong incentive of social networks. Citizens would be able to evaluate the legal service they were given according to selected criteria and to list, compare and choose legal service providers based on previous evaluations and scores. With such involvement of citizens we could improve quality of legal service provision and protect citizens from potential poor legal service.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: Conference Programme
    Download Restriction: no

    in new window

    This chapter was published in: Benjamin Lesjak & Dušan Lesjak , , pages 1201-1209, 2013.
    This item is provided by ToKnowPress in its series Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management & Innovation: Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2013 with number 1201-1209.
    Handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp13:1201-1209
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:mklp13:1201-1209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alen Jezovnik)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.