IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/undchp/978-3-031-09297-8_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Different Types of Productive Thinking in Design: From Rational to Social Design Thinking

In: Design Thinking Research

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Auernhammer

    (Stanford University)

  • Bernard Roth

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

This book chapter outlines the theory of Productive Thinking in Design. This theory is the psychological foundation of today’s Design Thinking. Productive Thinking incorporates the psychological processes of finding a need, problem, or structural tension and determining a means that satisfies the need and harmonizes the tension. These psychological processes are driven by forces and factors, including attitudes, attributes, and human values. In this article, we outline five different types of Productive Thinking and discuss them in the context of Design. These are (1) Rational, (2) Situational, (3) Experimental, (4) Dialectic, and (5) Counterproductive. Each type of Productive Thinking is dependent on the situational context for which a design solution needs to be created. For example, a situation in which a solution-method can be determined directly requires Rational Productive Thinking, while unintelligible, ambiguous, and emerging situations require Experimental or Dialectic Productive Thinking. We emphasize that it is essential to cultivate a Productive Culture in which individuals can freely, creatively, confidently, competently, and collaboratively design for a harmonious ecological and social whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Auernhammer & Bernard Roth, 2022. "Different Types of Productive Thinking in Design: From Rational to Social Design Thinking," Understanding Innovation, in: Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, pages 271-290, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-031-09297-8_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-09297-8_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-031-09297-8_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.