IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/undchp/978-3-030-28960-7_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Mining the Role of Design Reflection and Associated Brain Dynamics in Creativity

In: Design Thinking Research

Author

Listed:
  • Neeraj Sonalkar

    (Center for Design Research, Stanford University)

  • Sahar Jahanikia

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Hua Xie

    (OHSU Center for Regenerative Medicine)

  • Caleb Geniesse

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Rafi Ayub

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Roger Beaty

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Manish Saggar

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Reflection—the activity of reasoning through an action that has occurred—has been shown to be of importance to the development of design expertise. Although design reflection has been widely studied previously, several gaps in the knowledge still exist. First, previous work in design reflection has been mostly limited to descriptive and prescriptive research, while very few researchers investigated the effect of design reflection on performance of individuals and teams. Second, previous researchers limited the study of reflection to the language used and its reference to the design problem or solution space. Third, previous work on design reflection has not taken into account the antagonist of reflection—i.e., rumination. Rumination is characterized as repetitive and persistent evaluation of the meaning, causes, and consequences of one’s affective state and personal concerns, and has been shown to negatively affect creativity and problem solving. In this project, we planned to address these limitations by (1) assessing the effects of different types of reflection on creative performance; (2) going beyond the frontier of language (or speech) and additionally investigating the role of brain and interaction dynamics during design reflection; and (3) including psychological construct of rumination in addition to reflection. We hypothesized that given the critical importance of reflection in design thinking, our approach will provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between brain dynamics, design reflection, and creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Neeraj Sonalkar & Sahar Jahanikia & Hua Xie & Caleb Geniesse & Rafi Ayub & Roger Beaty & Manish Saggar, 2020. "Mining the Role of Design Reflection and Associated Brain Dynamics in Creativity," Understanding Innovation, in: Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, pages 155-167, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-030-28960-7_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28960-7_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-030-28960-7_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.