IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/topchp/978-3-032-00502-1_2.html

Fit for Purpose? A Four-Step Methodology for Evaluating Universal Service Obligations in the Postal Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Mindaugas Cerpickis

    (Copenhagen Economics)

  • Jacob Østermann

    (Copenhagen Economics)

  • Stephanie Tizik

    (Copenhagen Economics)

Abstract

A postal universal service obligation (USO) ensures that all consumers throughout a country have access to basic services within the postal sector, which can constitute a benefit for society. The benefits can arise for promoting social cohesion and inclusivity by providing postal products at a guaranteed quality level and uniform prices throughout the country. Market developments and significant changes to postal user needs in recent years have brought into question whether countries’ current USO scopes are still fit for this purpose. There can be a risk of regulatory failure if the historical objectives of the USO have changed compared to the current market environment. At the same time, the cost of maintaining an extensive USO can increase as some requirements, such as high delivery frequency, become more costly per unit to provide as letter volumes decline. We address the need for optimal design in USO policy, which balances the benefits and the costs of a USO. Further, we present a four-step methodology to evaluate the scope of the USO. The steps are supplemented with case examples from throughout Europe, where the abolishment of the USO in 2023 in Denmark serves as a recent example.

Suggested Citation

  • Mindaugas Cerpickis & Jacob Østermann & Stephanie Tizik, 2026. "Fit for Purpose? A Four-Step Methodology for Evaluating Universal Service Obligations in the Postal Sector," Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:topchp:978-3-032-00502-1_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-00502-1_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:topchp:978-3-032-00502-1_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.