IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-319-62319-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Methodology to Support Decision Making and Effective Human Reliability Methods in Aviation Safety

In: Human Factors and Reliability Engineering for Safety and Security in Critical Infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro Carlo Cacciabue

    (Kingston University)

  • Italo Oddone

    (Politecnico Milano)

Abstract

This Chapter shows firstly a practical way to support Risk Informed Decision Making processes. The approach, discussed only in abstract and theoretical terms, shows that it is possible to develop practical instruments supporting the safety analysts in presenting overall results of the risk analysis process to the decision makers in a way highlights the effectiveness of safety measures and their efficiency with respect to cost benefit. The second part of this Chapter evaluates four different and well established Human Reliability methods, with the aim to assess their differences and ability to cope with aviation procedures. The comparison of results of applying the methods to two aviation case studies shows advantages and drawbacks in the implementation of each method. It has not been possible to come to a conclusive assessment of the ability of the methods to cope with aviation issues, as a much more extensive process is necessary to carry out an accurate revision of existing data.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Carlo Cacciabue & Italo Oddone, 2018. "A Methodology to Support Decision Making and Effective Human Reliability Methods in Aviation Safety," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo (ed.), Human Factors and Reliability Engineering for Safety and Security in Critical Infrastructures, pages 225-258, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-319-62319-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62319-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-319-62319-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.