IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-032-22873-4_46.html

Prioritizing HSE Management Risks in Bridge Construction Projects Using Monte Carlo Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza Amanzadeh

    (Amirkabir University of Technology (AUT), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

  • Adel Gholami

    (Amirkabir University of Technology (AUT), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

  • Mahdi Mozaffari

    (Amirkabir University of Technology (AUT), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

Abstract

Bridge construction projects, particularly those within large-scale infrastructure developments, represent some of the most complex and risk-intensive activities in the global construction industry. Their dynamic nature, driven by uncertainty, time pressure, and environmental variability, necessitates the adoption of intelligent and data driven HSE (Health, Safety, and Environment) management systems to ensure resilience and operational safety. This study introduces a smart HSE risk prioritization model based on Monte Carlo probabilistic simulation, designed to support evidence-based decision-making in high-risk bridge construction environments. The research was conducted on a freeway megaproject comprising 25 major bridges with a total span of 3137 m, where numerous HSE challenges such as adverse weather conditions, working at heights, and fatal occupational incidents were observed. Expert judgments were collected using structured questionnaires and refined through the Delphi technique to identify critical safety factors. The Monte Carlo simulation method was applied to generate 2000 probabilistic scenarios, capturing uncertainty across multiple HSE dimensions. The resulting data were analyzed using the Copeland prioritization approach, providing a weighted ranking of risk categories based on their relative impact on project safety outcomes. The findings revealed that personnel-related and materials and equipment risks exerted the highest influence on overall HSE performance, while political and legal risks ranked lowest. These results emphasize the need for continuous organizational engagement across all project phases, from planning and design to contractor management and site operations, to enhance safety maturity and system reliability. By integrating probabilistic modeling with structured safety frameworks such as HSE-MS and Integrated Management Systems (IMS), this study demonstrates how traditional safety practices can evolve into smart, adaptive systems capable of learning from data and anticipating risks in real time. The approach illustrates a paradigm shift from reactive hazard control to proactive, intelligent safety management, supporting the broader vision of smart construction ecosystems where human expertise and computational intelligence work in synergy to prevent accidents and optimize project outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza Amanzadeh & Adel Gholami & Mahdi Mozaffari, 2026. "Prioritizing HSE Management Risks in Bridge Construction Projects Using Monte Carlo Modeling," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-032-22873-4_46
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-22873-4_46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-032-22873-4_46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.