IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-032-22873-4_38.html

Quantification of Risk and Control of Bidding for a Nuclear Power Plant Project’s Marine Water Intake Project

Author

Listed:
  • Mingfang Chen

    (China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd)

  • Tao Wang

    (China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd)

  • Xiaodong Guo

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, IMUT)

  • Xinhua YU

    (China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd)

Abstract

As a capital- and technology-intensive sector, nuclear power projects are characterized by substantial investment requirements and extended construction timelines, with bidding management exerting a significant influence on both project efficiency and quality. In response to the limitations of traditional bidding practices, particularly the difficulty in quantifying risk and the insufficiency of risk control measures, this study establishes a closed-loop system integrating risk quantification and risk control. Specifically, the weights of 15 identified risk factors are determined through the Analytic Hierarchy Process. A guarantee rate of no less than 95% for the control price is achieved using Monte Carlo simulation. Additionally, through enhancements in the design scheme comparison and optimization process, approximately 45% of cofferdam construction costs are reduced, construction-related risks are mitigated, and resource reuse yields savings of approximately two million yuan. This approach facilitates the transition of nuclear power bidding management from reliance on empirical decision-making toward a data-driven model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingfang Chen & Tao Wang & Xiaodong Guo & Xinhua YU, 2026. "Quantification of Risk and Control of Bidding for a Nuclear Power Plant Project’s Marine Water Intake Project," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-032-22873-4_38
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-22873-4_38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-032-22873-4_38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.