Author
Listed:
- Hafiz Muhammad Hazib
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University, State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, School of Ocean and Civil Engineering)
- Imran Shabbir
(Prime Engineering & Testing Consultants)
- Weizong Lai
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University, State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, School of Ocean and Civil Engineering)
- Yue Pan
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University, State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, School of Ocean and Civil Engineering)
- Jianjun Qin
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University, State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, School of Ocean and Civil Engineering)
Abstract
Given the rapid expansion of infrastructure such as large-scale bridges in developing countries, their environmental impacts, particularly during the construction phase from the perspective of carbon emissions, have attracted have become a subject of increasing scholarly and policy interest. This study presents a probabilistic life cycle assessment for a large-scale bridge in Pakistan to illustrate uncertainty propagation in carbon emission quantification during construction, beginning with the explicit identification of uncertainties in emission factors. Monte Carlo simulation is employed to estimate the embodied carbon footprint associated with material production, transportation, and on-site construction activities, resulting in an average of $$72.5{ } \times { }10^{6} { }\;{\text{kg CO}}_{2} - {\text{eq }}\left( {{ sigma }{ } = { }11.6{ } \times { }10^{6} {\text{ kg CO}}_{2} - {\text{eq}}} \right).$$ 72.5 × 10 6 kg CO 2 - eq sigma = 11.6 × 10 6 kg CO 2 - eq . The uncertainty propagation indicates substantial variability $$\left( {{\text{CV }} = { }16{\text{\% }}} \right)$$ CV = 16 \% with $$\pm 20{-}30\%$$ ± 20 - 30 % confidence intervals, driven by probabilistic characteristics of material, transportation, and energy emission factors. From the expected value perspective, material extraction accounts for 55% of total emissions, transportation for 43%, and construction activities for 3%. At the component-level, the superstructure ( $$23.38{ } \times { }10^{6} { }\;{\text{kg CO}}_{{2}} - {\text{eq}}$$ 23.38 × 10 6 kg CO 2 - eq ) and deck ( $$23.27 \times 10^{6} \;{\text{ kg CO}}_{{2}} - {\text{eq}}$$ 23.27 × 10 6 kg CO 2 - eq ) represent the primary sources. To reduce life-cycle emissions and associated uncertainties, technical measures such as low-clinker binders, optimized logistics, and BIM-integrated stochastic carbon modules are recommended, complemented by policy interventions including performance-based carbon caps, geospatial emission factors, and blockchain-based supplier disclosures. This framework advances traditional LCA methodologies, enabling more informed low-carbon decision-making in resource-constrained contexts.
Suggested Citation
Hafiz Muhammad Hazib & Imran Shabbir & Weizong Lai & Yue Pan & Jianjun Qin, 2026.
"Uncertainty Propagation in Bridge Construction Carbon Emission Quantification,"
Springer Series in Reliability Engineering,,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-032-22873-4_32
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-22873-4_32
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-032-22873-4_32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.