IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-031-14767-8_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Multi-objective Analysis and Comparison of Different Maintenance Strategies

In: Maintainability of Building Envelope Elements

Author

Listed:
  • Cláudia Ferreira

    (University of Lisbon)

  • Ana Silva

    (University of Lisbon)

  • Jorge de Brito

    (University of Lisbon)

  • Inês Flores-Colen

    (University of Lisbon)

Abstract

Since the parameters used to assess the influence of the maintenance strategies on the buildings’ envelope elements are interdependent, the constructive solutions’ advantages and disadvantages change according to the parameters analysed. To assess the constructive solutions in a global way, multi-objective strategies are implemented to optimize the outcomes and aid the decision-makers in the decision process. A multi-criteria decision analysis is implemented to compare the different maintenance strategies, while a multi-objective optimization is used to optimize the inspections’ frequencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cláudia Ferreira & Ana Silva & Jorge de Brito & Inês Flores-Colen, 2023. "Multi-objective Analysis and Comparison of Different Maintenance Strategies," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Maintainability of Building Envelope Elements, chapter 0, pages 117-189, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-031-14767-8_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14767-8_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-031-14767-8_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.