IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-031-05347-4_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Machine Learning Based Software Defect Categorization Using Crowd Labeling

In: Predictive Analytics in System Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Sushil Kumar

    (Shyam Lal College, University of Delhi)

  • Meera Sharma

    (Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi)

  • S. K. Muttoo

    (University of Delhi)

  • V. B. Singh

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

Abstract

Defect categorization is an important task which helps in software maintenance. It also helps in prioritizing the defects, resource allocation, etc. Standard machine learning techniques can be used to automate the categorization of defects. Labeled data is needed for learning models. The expert is required for obtaining the labeled data. Sometimes, it is costly or expert is not available. So, to overcome this dependency, crowd labeled data is used to train a model. Crowd (a set of novices) is asked to assign a category as defined by IBM’s Orthogonal Defect Classification (ODC) to the defect reports. Obtaining categories through crowd can be inaccurate or noisy. Inferencing ground truth is a challenge in crowd labeling. Support Vector Machine, k Nearest Neighbor and Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier, are learnt effectively using new methodology from data labeled by a set of novices. In this chapter, we have proposed a learning model which learns effectively to predict the impact category of software defects using the expectation maximization algorithm and shows the better performance according to the various types of metrics by improving the existing technique by 8% and 11% accuracy for Compendium and Mozilla datasets respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Sushil Kumar & Meera Sharma & S. K. Muttoo & V. B. Singh, 2023. "Machine Learning Based Software Defect Categorization Using Crowd Labeling," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Vijay Kumar & Hoang Pham (ed.), Predictive Analytics in System Reliability, pages 213-227, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-031-05347-4_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05347-4_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-031-05347-4_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.