IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssdmcp/978-3-319-41304-4_2.html

Alternative Formulas for Selected Indices

In: New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Fossett

    (Texas A&M University, Department of Sociology)

Abstract

The values of all popular indices of uneven distribution can be obtained using a variety of mathematically equivalent computing formulas. For a given index some formulas are more familiar and widely used than others, but no single formula can be declared sacred or best for all purposes. The many alternatives can be confusing to those who are new to segregation research. But their availability benefits researchers by providing a variety of options from which to choose to best serve the needs of a particular study. The relevant considerations can include factors such as efficiency of computation, ease of explaining the index to broad audiences, relevance for establishing appealing substantive interpretations, capacity for enabling practical tasks such as decomposition analysis or the calculation of spatial versions of index scores, and utility for pinpointing technical issues in segregation measurement. Researchers may choose a particular formula specifically to serve the needs of a given study. Or they may use a formula based on familiarity and habit. But in one crucial sense the choice is unimportant as all valid formulas can be used interchangeably without affecting the results of individual index scores, research findings, and substantive conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Fossett, 2017. "Alternative Formulas for Selected Indices," The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, in: New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation, chapter 0, pages 11-17, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-319-41304-4_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41304-4_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-319-41304-4_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.