Author
Listed:
- Giuliana Passamani
(University of Trento, Department of Economics and Management)
- Paola Masotti
(University of Trento, Department of Economics and Management)
Abstract
Exposure to high levels of air pollution represents a major risk factor, as it may produce adverse health effects documented by numerous studies (e.g., Fuller et al., The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(6), e535–e547, 2022). In order to work towards reaching SDG target 3.9.1, that aims to reduction in illnesses and deaths attributed to ambient air pollution, we need to define a model for measuring and predicting risk associated to exposure. Given that ambient air pollution is the outcome of complex mixtures of air pollutants emitted from various activities, an approximation of their combined effects and of impacts on health can be assessed if we could assume some form of independence and little correlation between the pollutants. But these assumptions are quite unrealistic: in fact, in order to be able to control pollution and to measure its risk on health, it’s important to have reliable estimates of the relations among pollutants and of their correlations. In the present paper, for the purpose of estimating time-varying correlations, we consider the extension of univariate volatility models to a new class of dynamic multivariate models called Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) models, introduced by Engle (Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339–350, 2002): this class of multivariate models uses a nonlinear combination of univariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models, with time-varying cross equation weights, to model the conditional covariance matrix of the errors. In other words, for measuring and predicting pollution risk we use GARCH-DCC models developed for measuring and hedging financial risk. The dataset consists of daily standardized concentrations, over two years, on three pollutants, PM10, NO2 and O3, which are interrelated and represent the so-called photochemical pollution factor. The three variables are observed at a single urban monitoring site. As we see from the empirical analysis of our dataset, pollutants concentrations show the presence of significant and different GARCH effects and of interesting trends in their dynamic conditional correlations. The purpose of this paper is to explore whether the use of a multivariate (asymmetric) GARCH-DCC model can lead to a more accurate risk prediction for air pollution. In particular, we aim to determine how positive shocks to the observed pollutants can increase health risk. Interesting results emerge for particulate matter and ozone, both of which have great effects on human health.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-031-82279-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.