IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sptchp/978-3-032-04137-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Some Environmental Advocacy Organizations and Their Contributions

In: Business Ethics and the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Robinson

    (SUNY Fredonia)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the efforts of five environmental advocacy organizations (EAOs) and associated coalitions: (1) The Friends of the Everglades, (2) The Friends of the Columbia River Gorge, the (3) Chesapeake Bay Foundation, (4) the Riverkeepers Coalition, and (5) the Grand Traverse Band of Chippewa. They all illustrate a fundamental theme of this text, i.e. that our environmental advocacy organizations effectively manifest our collective duties of virtue. As such, they embody the most effective aspects of our environmental restoration movement. These organizations assist in promoting our “fair and reasoned criteria” for our society’s decisions concerning environmental restoration: (i) that these decisions are uncorrupted by narrow conflicts of interest, (ii) that our decision processes are fully informed of the relevant scientific and socioeconomic analyses, (iii) that our decision processes are fully open to discourse from all affected interests, and (iv) the decisions are logical according to the Rawlsian “stability criteria of independent review” as explained in previous chapters. Elinor Ostrom’s institutional analyses and requirements are also applied to these organizational examples. A conclusion concerning the political motivation behind the formation of environmental organizations is posed and substantiated by the actions of the five organizations cited above.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Robinson, 2025. "Some Environmental Advocacy Organizations and Their Contributions," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Business Ethics and the Environment, chapter 9, pages 177-202, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-032-04137-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-04137-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-032-04137-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.