Author
Listed:
- Pete Bettinger
(University of Georgia)
Abstract
Much like threshold accepting and simulated annealing, in its basic form, tabu search is an s-metaheuristic, which implies that a current, feasible solution to a problem will be transformed into a new feasible solution to a problem through a move in a local neighborhood. And, as with other heuristic methods, a specific move can be selected from the neighborhood multiple times during a search for the optimal solution. One difference between tabu search and the other two methods is that the move through the local neighborhood is deterministic. The best move from the local neighborhood is selected, regardless of whether the value of the new solution is better or worse than the value of the previous solution. The caveat to this process is that, in general, the move cannot consist of one that was selected recently, in terms of iterations of the model. This restriction preventing the use of recently selected moves represents the taboo (or tabu) nature of the search process. In effect, a recently selected move is tabu. There is one minor relaxation of this rule: if a potential move is tabu yet will lead to a superior solution that has not yet been recognized, the tabu restriction is ignored and the move is allowed. A second main difference between tabu search and the other two methods mentioned above involves the termination rule. In general, tabu search is allowed to run for some pre-defined number of iterations of the model (although more sophisticated termination rules can be developed). Simulated annealing and threshold accepting, in general, are allowed to run as long as the key variable (temperature or threshold) remains above a minimum, pre-defined value. Ordinarily, tabu search requires more time to complete a search, as compared to threshold accepting and simulated annealing, because many different alternatives need to be assessed in the local neighborhood before one of them is selected.
Suggested Citation
Pete Bettinger, 2025.
"Tabu Search,"
Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Forest Harvest Scheduling, chapter 0, pages 197-215,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-031-89432-9_10
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-89432-9_10
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-031-89432-9_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.