IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprfcp/978-3-030-81843-2_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Time-Inconsistent Stopping Under Distorted Probabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Björk

    (Stockholm School of Economics)

  • Mariana Khapko

    (University of Toronto)

  • Agatha Murgoci

    (Ørsted)

Abstract

In this chapter we study stopping strategies in the presence of distorted probabilities, in both discrete and continuous time. Probability distortion is a salient ingredient for a number of important models in behavioral economics, including cumulative prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky (Econometrica 47:263–291, 1979), Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:297–323, 1992)) and rank-dependent utility (Quiggin (Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3:323–343, 1982), Schmeidler (Econometrica 57:571–587, 1989)). Contrary to the expected utility theory, in the prospect theory model, economic agents do not weight outcomes by their objective probabilities but rather by transformed probabilities. These transformed probabilities (or decision weights) allow the model to capture economic behavior observed in experimental settings showing that people tend to overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities. Similarly, rank-dependent expected utility overweighs unlikely extreme outcomes. Importantly, in a dynamic context probability weighting makes the decision maker’s problem inherently time inconsistent. Mathematically, the reward functional with probability distortion involves the so-called Choquet integral (Choquet (Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 5:131–295, 1954)), instead of the conventional expectation.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:sprfcp:978-3-030-81843-2_25
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81843-2_25
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprfcp:978-3-030-81843-2_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.