IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-99-2329-8_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Evolutionary Process of Tax Treaties and Its Interplay with EU Law: A Critical Analysis

In: The European Union and the Evolving Architectures of International Economic Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Saurabh Jain

    (Curtin University)

  • Maria Eleni Pouliasi

    (University of Auckland)

Abstract

Although the existing network of double tax agreements, the Model Tax Information Exchange Agreement (‘TIEA’), and the Multilateral Instrument (‘MLI’) co-exist, they indicate that the evolutionary process of tax treaties is heading towards different directions. Today, more than 3000 double tax treaties exist, most of which follow either the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (‘OECD’) or United Nations (‘UN’) Model Tax Convention. Traditionally, the system of international taxation consists of a network of tax agreements, which are bilateral in nature. Thus, the current framework of the double tax agreements represents the status quo. Despite the widely known advantages of the multilateral approach in the evolution of tax treaties, the first noticeable development took place in 2016 with the adoption of the MLI as a result of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (‘BEPS’) project. Although the MLI is the first step, it is a beacon to a shift towards multilateralism. From the point of reference of the current network of bilateral double tax agreements, the adoption of the MLI is a step forward. In 2002, following the OECD’s efforts to address harmful tax practices, the OECD formulated the Model TIEA. In contrast to bilateral double taxation agreements—which govern the taxation of various aspects of cross-border transactions—tax information exchange agreements regulate the aspect of the exchange of information only. They are special agreements with a limited scope. The existence of TIEAs is justifiable; however, from the point of reference of the current network of bilateral double tax agreements, they represent a step backward. This chapter also analyses the bilateralism versus multilateralism dichotomy in the light of recent European Union (‘EU’) transfer pricing case law. The chapter, in particular, refers to the Apple case. The EU courts have used treaty law to solve matters related to EU law. Their approach creates an opening to a fertile dialogue between the EU and third countries. It also results in the recognition and incorporation of some internationally accepted principles into positive law. The next step towards multilateralism is to incorporate these principles as binding parts of the MLI.

Suggested Citation

  • Saurabh Jain & Maria Eleni Pouliasi, 2023. "The Evolutionary Process of Tax Treaties and Its Interplay with EU Law: A Critical Analysis," Springer Books, in: Ottavio Quirico & Katarzyna Kwapisz Williams (ed.), The European Union and the Evolving Architectures of International Economic Agreements, chapter 0, pages 249-269, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-99-2329-8_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-2329-8_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-99-2329-8_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.