IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-97-2211-2_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Important but not for Me: Understanding Older Adults’ Resistance to Gerontechnology

In: Emerging Technologies in Business

Author

Listed:
  • Pei-Lee Teh

    (Monash University Malaysia)

  • Hailiang Wang

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Chee-Wei Phang

    (University of Nottingham Ningbo China)

  • Alan H. S. Chan

    (City University of Hong Kong)

  • Hirra Pervez Butt

    (Monash University Malaysia)

Abstract

Gerontechnology, a widely regarded solution for aging populations that increasingly need assistance in their day-to-day lives, has yet to be able to effectively benefit older adults due to their resistance as users. The present study investigated the antecedents of older adults’ resistance toward using a smartphone-enabled home automation system. Using the lens of the equity-implementation model and the status quo bias theory, a structural model of user resistance was proposed and empirically tested using survey data collected from 182 seniors aged 55 years old and above in Malaysia. The component-based partial least square (PLS) method was employed to assess the psychometric properties of the study’s constructs and the research hypotheses. The results showed that 43.1% of the variance of user resistance was explained by seniors’ perceived value of gerontechnology and their anxiety about it. Gerontechnology anxiety has the strongest impact on user resistance and when older adults feel a high level of anxiety about using gerontechnology, they perceive fewer benefits and higher costs to switching to it. Switching benefits and costs significantly affect the perceived value of the technology. Higher self-actualization increases switching benefits, while higher self-efficacy for change reduces switching costs. The practical and theoretical implications of the research are discussed to inform researchers and practitioners of the factors contributing to older adults’ resistance to using new technology and information systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei-Lee Teh & Hailiang Wang & Chee-Wei Phang & Alan H. S. Chan & Hirra Pervez Butt, 2024. "Important but not for Me: Understanding Older Adults’ Resistance to Gerontechnology," Springer Books, in: Andrei O. J. Kwok & Pei-Lee Teh (ed.), Emerging Technologies in Business, pages 11-45, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-2211-2_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-2211-2_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-2211-2_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.