IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-96-9505-8_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Empirical Testing the Feasibility of Mutual Funding as a Risk Diversification Tool in Vietnam

In: Regulating Peer-to-Peer Lending in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Yen Hai Nguyen

    (Hanoi Law University)

Abstract

This chapter describes and explains how the empirical study in this research was conducted. The analysis presented in this book draws on empirical material collected through face-to-face interviews, followed by email or chat communication with interviewees for follow-up questions. After a brief introduction of the design of the empirical test, the chapter ends with several important selected results of the empirical research and an explanation on the limitations of this empirical research. In the legal research addressing the diversification of lenders’ risk in P2P lending in Vietnam, the socioeconomic conditions surrounding the P2P lending business have seldom been considered, as noted in Sect. 1.2 . In this chapter, the author aims to find measures to mitigate risks for P2P lenders using various means, including diversification. An empirical study of Vietnam’s P2P lending business is then conducted to assess the viability of these risk-mitigation measures, as proposed in Chap. 7 . This study examines the attitudes of potential lenders in P2P lending toward a mutual funding scheme, aiming to ascertain their willingness to participate in the scheme. It also delves into the impact of personal relationships among participants and the importance of professional management in overseeing the operation of the scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen Hai Nguyen, 2025. "Empirical Testing the Feasibility of Mutual Funding as a Risk Diversification Tool in Vietnam," Springer Books, in: Regulating Peer-to-Peer Lending in Vietnam, chapter 0, pages 257-264, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-96-9505-8_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-9505-8_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-96-9505-8_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.