IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-96-8208-9_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

“They Wouldn’t Let Poor Rudolph Play in Any Reindeer Games”: Individuals on the Autism Spectrum as Social Misfits in Organisations

In: Employee Misfit

Author

Listed:
  • Debra R. Comer

    (Hofstra University)

Abstract

This chapter uses the story of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer to examine the social misfit of individuals on the autism spectrum in neuronormative organisations. The author analyses the 1939 storybook and 1964 film to illustrate how difference becomes stigmatised through social construction and power relations. Drawing on Goffman’s theory of stigma and the neurodiversity paradigm, the author argues that individuals on the autism spectrum often experience “repeating social misfit” because their communication and behavioural styles diverge from neurotypical expectations. The Rudolph metaphor reveals how masking and camouflaging, like Rudolph’s false nose, may enable temporary acceptance but lead to stress, exhaustion, and the loss of authenticity. The chapter integrates research on stigma, misfit, and neurodiversity to explain how organisational cultures sustain neuronormativity and exclusion. It concludes with practical guidance for reducing social misfit by promoting cross-neurotype communication. By combining narrative analysis and organisational behaviour theory, the chapter advances understanding of misfit as a socially constructed condition rooted in dominant norms and demonstrates that neuroinclusion requires changing systems rather than individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Debra R. Comer, 2025. "“They Wouldn’t Let Poor Rudolph Play in Any Reindeer Games”: Individuals on the Autism Spectrum as Social Misfits in Organisations," Springer Books, in: Jon Billsberry & Danielle L. Talbot (ed.), Employee Misfit, pages 189-205, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-96-8208-9_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-8208-9_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-96-8208-9_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.