IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-95-2864-6_4.html

Departing from Privileged to Merit-Based Grant Support Programmes

In: Evaluation of Small Business Support in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Olaniyi Aluko

    (University of South Africa)

Abstract

The chapter evaluates the performance of funded small businesses before and after 1994 to determine the efficiency of grant policies in post-colonial South Africa. The literature is rife with arguments regarding the politicisation and corruption surrounding the funding of small businesses. Certain sections advocate for a new funding formula and enhanced evaluation tools to improve the processes for state-supported grant programmes. This chapter diverges from that argument to investigate whether South Africa’s historical context influences grant policies and the trends in the implementation of government funding, including loans. While pre-colonial literature aids in understanding the historical narrative regarding business funding, data on business performance post-receipt of government support offers intriguing insights into businesses’ perceptions of such assistance. This analysis concentrates on the capability of SMEs to manage their businesses successfully. The key finding highlights the necessity to redesign policies from a privileged perspective to establish a merit-based framework for assessing the effectiveness of South African grant support programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Olaniyi Aluko, 2025. "Departing from Privileged to Merit-Based Grant Support Programmes," Springer Books, in: Evaluation of Small Business Support in Post-Apartheid South Africa, chapter 0, pages 99-122, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-2864-6_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-2864-6_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-2864-6_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.