IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-95-2077-0_23.html

Political and Administrative Hegemony of Left Democratic Front in Kerala in Policy Making and Policy Implementation with special reference to People’s Plan Campaign

In: Quest for Planetary Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Jos Chathukulam

    (Institute for Social and Economic Change, Ramakrishna Hegde Chair on Decentralization and Development
    Centre for Rural Management (CRM))

  • Manasi Joseph

    (Centre for Rural Management (CRM))

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the political hegemony of the Left Democratic Front (LDF) in Kerala over the 1996 People’s Plan Campaign (PPC) and examines how it helped the LDF to capture local government and its apparatuses in the state. It closely looks into the correlation between the political and administrative hegemony and policy making and policy implementation process with the help of the empirical evidences and experiments rooted in PPC. It further looks into the role of political hegemony and dominance of LDF in relation to Covid-19 pandemic management and assesses its role in generating performance legitimacy to the ruling LDF in the 2020 local government elections and 2021 Kerala State Assembly Elections. The introductory part of the paper discusses the emergence of 1996 PPC as one of the significant policy initiatives initiated by Left intellectuals and political elites in Kerala. The paper argues that the PPC campaign conceptualized by the LDF granted them political dominance not only in the areas of democratic decentralization and local governments but also in the field of public administration. The first part of the paper offers discussions on the evolution, strengths, challenges, and weaknesses in the PPC framework in Kerala since 1996. The second part of the paper looks into the role played by Kudumbashree, an offspring of the 1996 PPC, in leveraging political patronage and hegemony for the LDF by evolving into a reckoning force not only in empowering women but also the state at large. It also critically revisits the PPC and argues that the decentralization experiences in Kerala was operated within a controlled framework in which local governments were downsized by the state. The third part of the paper focuses on the revival of the PPC in 2016 and the fourth part of the paper discusses how clientelism and populist welfare schemes of the LDF government, especially during crises including the two great floods of 2018 and 2019 and the Covid-19 pandemic empowered their chances to normalize political hegemony. The paper further argues that the foundations laid by the first phase of the PPC in 1996 and second phase in 2016 had a significant role in generating performance legitimacy for the LDF in the 2020 local government elections and 2022 assembly elections in Kerala. The paper concludes that the LDF government used PPC used as a tool for political mobilization by infusing it with welfare and populistic measures and converted it into a sort of vote-bank politics by giving a perception that they follow a hegemonic and non-hegemonic generative politics. The crucial question that the paper attempts to determine is that the democratic decentralization under PPC can either be regarded as a “viable democratic model” that lies between the opposing viewpoints of “nothing can be done” and “everything can be done” or one that encompasses both hegemonic and non-hegemonic generative approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Jos Chathukulam & Manasi Joseph, 2026. "Political and Administrative Hegemony of Left Democratic Front in Kerala in Policy Making and Policy Implementation with special reference to People’s Plan Campaign," Springer Books, in: Ananta Kumar Giri & R. S. Deshpande (ed.), Quest for Planetary Well-Being, chapter 0, pages 465-484, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-2077-0_23
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-2077-0_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-2077-0_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.