Author
Listed:
- Loganathan Krishnan
(Universiti Malaya)
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, the company has emerged as the dominant form of business entity, surpassing sole proprietorships and partnerships in both prevalence and economic influence. This trend is driven by the company’s unique ability to mobilize substantial capital for operational and expansionary purposes. However, it is imperative that such capital is utilized strictly for lawful and ethical activities. In this context, auditors are entrusted with the critical duty of examining and verifying corporate financial activities to ensure transparency and compliance. The failure of companies has far-reaching consequences, often severely impacting the rights and interests of stakeholders. A recurring theme in many corporate collapses is the inadequate performance of auditors in fulfilling their professional responsibilities. This underscores the need for heightened scrutiny of the auditor’s role and a reassessment of their legal and ethical obligations. Auditing provides a mechanism for corporate accountability by offering “reasonable assurance” on the accuracy of financial statements. Without such assurance, the reliability of audit reports is compromised, potentially misleading stakeholders and enabling financial misconduct. The increasing frequency of financial scandals involving auditors has cast doubt on the sufficiency of existing regulatory frameworks. Safeguarding stakeholder interests now demands a more robust legal regime—one that deters negligence and unethical conduct within the audit profession. Legislative reforms are therefore essential to prevent future financial wrongdoing and restore public trust in the integrity of audit processes. Auditors serve as vital gatekeepers of corporate integrity. In fulfilling this role, they must transcend the traditional metaphor of passive “watchdogs” and instead embrace the more proactive and investigative function of “bloodhounds.” Given the magnitude of financial harm that can befall stakeholders, auditors must be held accountable for the quality and integrity of their work. The significant powers conferred upon them must be exercised with diligence, independence, and a heightened sense of public responsibility. To strengthen audit accountability, auditors must engage with a diverse range of perspectives—including those of regulators, professional bodies, industry experts, and academics—to continually refine their role. In parallel, the scope of duty owed by auditors must be expanded beyond the corporate client to include a broader range of affected parties, aligning with evolving global standards and stakeholder expectations.
Suggested Citation
Loganathan Krishnan, 2025.
"Conclusion,"
Springer Books, in: A Paradigm Shift of Auditors' Role, Duties and Liabilities in Malaysia, chapter 0, pages 229-254,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0796-2_8
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-0796-2_8
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0796-2_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.