Author
Abstract
This chapter investigates the optimal interplay between governmental policies and market-based instruments for achieving carbon emission reductions. Recognizing the evolution of global climate governance from top-down mandates to bottom-up contributions, the chapter emphasizes that mechanism choice must align with national circumstances and reduction targets. It contrasts government regulation (often command-and-control, deriving implicit carbon prices) with market mechanisms (quantity-based, like ETS, or price-based, like carbon taxes, forming explicit prices). Efficiency emerges as the pivotal criterion for selecting and coordinating these approaches. Drawing upon climate economics and neo-institutionalism, the analysis highlights the inherent limitations of employing either mechanism in isolation. While government regulation can ensure target achievement, it may lack cost-effectiveness and innovation incentives. Market mechanisms excel at optimizing resource allocation and minimizing societal costs by balancing marginal abatement costs but face risks like price volatility or potential failure to meet targets. Consequently, the chapter advocates for hybrid or mixed mechanisms, which synergistically leverage the strengths of both—government oversight ensuring stability and direction, and market forces driving efficiency and innovation. The chapter introduces analytical methods for evaluating and coordinating these mechanisms, including computable general equilibrium models (CEEPA-CETA) for simulating economic impacts and the “relative slope criterion” derived from Integrated Assessment Models (C3IAM) for guiding the choice between price and quantity instruments under uncertainty. Practical strategies for enhancing market mechanism effectiveness are discussed, focusing on institutional robustness (e.g., MRV systems), broad participation, auction design, and the development of carbon finance. Ultimately, the chapter concludes that a well-coordinated, context-specific blend of government regulation and market mechanisms is crucial for maximizing carbon reduction efficiency and achieving climate goals cost-effectively.
Suggested Citation
Yi-Ming Wei, 2025.
"Efficiency Coordination: Government Regulation and Market Mechanism Synergy,"
Springer Books, in: Carbon Mitigation System Engineering, chapter 5, pages 111-127,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0371-1_5
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-0371-1_5
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0371-1_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.