Author
Abstract
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology, as a critical pathway toward achieving carbon neutrality, faces multidimensional and interconnected risks throughout its lifecycle, necessitating systematic risk management to balance emission reduction benefits with potential threats. Based on the ISO framework, CCUS risks are categorized into policy risks (e.g., regulatory gaps and geopolitical volatility), economic risks (e.g., high costs and limited financing channels), HSE risks (e.g., CO2 leakage, induced seismicity, and ecological impacts), technical risks (e.g., immature processes and data scarcity), market risks (e.g., underdeveloped carbon markets and competitive technologies), resource risks (e.g., increased energy/water consumption), and social risks (e.g., low public acceptance). These risks dynamically interact across project phases and require tiered assessment through qualitative (e.g., feature-event-process (FEP) analysis), quantitative (e.g., CO2-PENS modeling and Monte Carlo simulations), and semi-quantitative (e.g., risk matrices and the as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) principle) methods. Qualitative approaches address data-scarce scenarios, quantitative methods leverage numerical simulations to quantify leakage probabilities and economic losses, while semi-quantitative strategies integrate expert judgment and scenario-based decision-making. Mitigation strategies encompass: Technological advancements, including low-energy capture materials and intelligent monitoring systems, alongside cross-industry data-sharing platforms; policy alignment, refining regulations by integrating international frameworks (e.g., the US 45Q tax credit) and clarifying post-closure liability mechanisms; economic incentives, reducing costs through economies of scale, innovating carbon-financing instruments, and diversifying funding models; HSE management, implementing lifecycle leakage early-warning systems and enhancing reservoir integrity assessments with emergency protocols; social engagement, fostering transparency and participatory governance to boost public trust. Future priorities include developing dynamic risk assessment tools, harmonizing international technical standards, and promoting synergies between CCUS and renewable energy systems. These efforts aim to overcome commercialization barriers and accelerate the scalable deployment of CCUS, ensuring its pivotal role in achieving global net-zero targets with balanced risk–benefit outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Yi-Ming Wei, 2025.
"Risk Management for CCUS Projects,"
Springer Books, in: Carbon Mitigation System Engineering, chapter 17, pages 413-439,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0371-1_17
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-0371-1_17
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0371-1_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.