IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-33-4635-2_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Rural Labour Unionism in Brazil: The Transformations of the National Confederation of Farm Workers (CONTAG)

In: Labour Questions in the Global South

Author

Listed:
  • Eryka Galindo

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

  • Marcelo C. Rosa

    (CPDA/UFRRJ, Rio de Janeiro Federal Rural University)

Abstract

This chapter aims to examine the transformation in rural unions as part of a broader analysis of the question of labour in Brazil today. Although some of the literature acknowledges that traditional forms of social organisation have dwindled in Brazil, trade unions—especially those representing rural workers—remain strong. This can be seen not only in the numbers but also in the influence that these unions have, both with state institutions and in international forums (Maybury-Lewis, The Politics of the Possible: The Brazilian Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994; Pereira, End of the Peasantry: The Rural Labour Movement in Northeast Brazil, 1961–1988. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997; Carvalho, A produção do transnacional: compilações da agricultura familiar e camponesa na Contag e no MPA. PPG Doctoral Thesis in the Social Sciences. Belo Horizonte, UFMG, 2018). The union rural workers system in Brazil is comprised of a network of over 4000 affiliate unions that have been grouped under a single umbrella organisation, the National Confederation of Farm Workers (CONTAG), for the past five decades. This mammoth-like but at the same time, tightly concentrated union system has been sustained by two Brazilian legal principles. The first establishes that there can be only one union for each trade in a given geographical area (a concept known as unicidade sindical) while the second establishes “rural worker” as a general occupational category that comprises a wide range of workers and labour relations in the countryside. The objective of this chapter is to analyse the processes associated with the construction, reinterpretations and subsequent transformations in the rural worker category in the context of union organisation in Brazil. More specifically, it sets out to examine how these transformations influenced CONTAG’s recent division between the occupational categories of the rural worker and the family farmer. The modifications to the rural worker category, in turn, led to changes in the modus operandi, union structure and political organisation of CONTAG. As a result of these adaptations, the system for the representation of rural workers from the countryside is holding steady five decades after it was originally introduced. The aspects of this process to be explored herein include: (1) the emergence during the 1980s of new political subjects in the countryside who joined diverse social movements and demanded recognition and representation, thus revealing the limitations of the generic category of the “rural worker” and calling into question the CONTAG system’s ability to represent the collective interests of workers; (2) social transformations, a series of changes in production and economics that altered rural labour relations in Brazil, especially among wage earners; (3) a combination of these factors, which contributed to new court interpretations of the rural worker occupational category, leading, in turn, to adaptations at the organisational level among rural trade unions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eryka Galindo & Marcelo C. Rosa, 2021. "Rural Labour Unionism in Brazil: The Transformations of the National Confederation of Farm Workers (CONTAG)," Springer Books, in: Praveen Jha & Walter Chambati & Lyn Ossome (ed.), Labour Questions in the Global South, chapter 0, pages 269-287, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-33-4635-2_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4635-2_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-33-4635-2_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.