IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-19-2041-7_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Evolution of Global Oversight Institutions: From the Library Group to the Group of Twenty

In: From Centralised to Decentralising Global Economic Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Xianbai Ji

    (Renmin University of China)

Abstract

During the past decades, the Group of Seven (G7) leading industrial democracies and the Group of Twenty (G20) comprising the G7 countries and systematically important emerging economies have established themselves as the twin global steering committees overseeing the functioning of the global economic governance architecture. The G7 process began in 1973 with a group of finance ministers from the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and West Germany meeting privately at the White House library to coordinate monetary policies following the Nixon Shock. It was upgraded to summit-level meetings in 1975 and incorporated additional members of Japan, Italy and Canada, making it the G7. For the period of 1998–2014 when the grouping was referred to as the G8, Russia was a member. A major enlargement of the grouping occurred in 1999 in the aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis. Financial and central bank technocrats from developing and emerging economies started to meet with their counterparts from the established G7 powers, paving the way for the establishment of the G20. The G20 became a leaders’ forum in 2008 at the height of the Global Financial Crisis and gradually expanded its agenda from the pre-established set of economic and financial issues to other aspects of global governance. This chapter traces the historical evolution of the global oversight institutions from the quadripartite Library Group to the G20 through the G7/8. The G7/8 and G20 as self-select elite governance groups suffer from varying degrees of substantive, input and output legitimacy—components of what can be referred to as “whole-process legitimacy”. Proposals are advanced to enhance the effectiveness-legitimacy nexus for the two institutions. The chapter concludes by arguing that the two G-groupings should refocus and reposition themselves as global oversight bodies and come up with a division of labour to promote functional complementarity between the two, and between them and a wide range of functional international governance institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianbai Ji, 2022. "The Evolution of Global Oversight Institutions: From the Library Group to the Group of Twenty," Springer Books, in: Pradumna B. Rana & Xianbai Ji (ed.), From Centralised to Decentralising Global Economic Architecture, chapter 0, pages 27-48, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-19-2041-7_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-2041-7_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-19-2041-7_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.