Author
Abstract
This chapter examines the trilateral ecological diplomacy between the EU, Russia, and China. It shows how the EU’s decarbonization policies have strong effects on Russia’s aspiration to capitalize on its comparative advantages in Arctic hydrocarbons production and, in turn, have accelerated its turn to China. First, the chapter examines Russia’s successful Arctic LNG strategy. Then it delves into the EU’s evolving approaches in decarbonization, and asks what the implications of its climate geopolitics are for a deepening Russia–China partnership. The EU has long prided itself on its leadership in responding to threats to the global climate system. The outlook for Russian LNG sales to Europe is likely to worsen particularly beyond 2030 as the EU’s energy policy becomes heavily focused on decarbonization of energy supply and boosting the share of renewables in the bloc’s energy mix. To move into a next phase of climate security, the EU is now building a so-called green taxonomy, a move that has been met with skepticism by Russia, among others, on the grounds that the EU wants to project its environmental values abroad through trade. The chapter then focuses on Russia and China’s expanded Arctic collaboration, in part resulting from the EU’s environmental stewardship. It argues, however, that cooperation between China and Russia in the Arctic is exclusively economic. Next, it builds a case for the shift in focus through two levels of analysis: one that closely assesses current approaches to hydrocarbon production in the Russian Arctic and one that evaluates the extent of Russia’s commitment to international climate policy. It concludes with a big-picture reflection on how Russia should strive to reconcile delivering decarbonization solutions with projections of growing natural gas use, which—in the short term—may still contribute positively to a broader ecological security agenda, either directly or converted to other fuels such as hydrogen.
Suggested Citation
Morena Skalamera, 2022.
"The EU’s Low-Carbon Policies and Implications for Arctic Energy Projects: The Russian Case,"
Springer Books, in: Anastasia Likhacheva (ed.), Arctic Fever, pages 333-354,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-9616-9_13
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-9616-9_13
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-9616-9_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.