IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-16-4671-3_22.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Sustainable Tourism and Public Opinion: Examining the Language Surrounding the Closure of Uluru to Climbers

In: Case Based Research in Tourism, Travel, Hospitality and Events

Author

Listed:
  • Bridget Tombleson

    (Curtin University)

  • Katharina Wolf

    (Curtin University)

Abstract

The decision to cease the climbing of one of Australia’s major tourist attractions, the UNESCO World Heritage site Uluru, on 26th October 2019, has attracted much controversy, debate and worldwide attention. This case study explores traditional media commentary and reporting as well as social mediaSocial media discussions in the lead up to the closure of the climb. Drawing on framing theory, three key frames emerge that illustrate the opposing perspectives on the role of destinationDestinations tourism. Through the economic lens, UNESCO World Heritage attractionsAttractions like the Uluru climb perform a crucial role in supporting a country’s economyEconomies. As a national treasure, the rock should be freely accessible to all Australians (entitlement frame). However, the inclusive sustainabilitySustainability worldview considers a site’s history, contemporary relationship with the (localLocals) community and potential for future generations. This case highlights issues in change management processes with regards to access to heritage sites. Insights into the narrative in the lead up to the closure of the climb enable readers to explore the complexities surrounding the desire to shift towards a more sustainable tourism model.

Suggested Citation

  • Bridget Tombleson & Katharina Wolf, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism and Public Opinion: Examining the Language Surrounding the Closure of Uluru to Climbers," Springer Books, in: Marianna Sigala & Anastasia Yeark & Rajka Presbury & Marcela Fang & Karen A. Smith (ed.), Case Based Research in Tourism, Travel, Hospitality and Events, chapter 0, pages 401-419, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-4671-3_22
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-4671-3_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-4671-3_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.