IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-16-3587-8_27.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Analysis of the Coordination Degree of the Construction Waste Recycling Policy Among Different Stakeholders

In: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyu Huang

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Hong Lang

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Mingxue Ma

    (Western Sydney University)

Abstract

With the acceleration of the urbanization process, the continuous demolition of old buildings and the start of new projects in China, more and more attention have been paid to the negative impact on the environment exerted by a large number of construction waste. In recent years, the state and some local governments have successively issued policies on waste from construction and demolition. Although the main components of waste have recycling potential, the recycling rate in 2017 was only 5%. These measures can only be made full use if they are highly recognized by society. However, the effectiveness of the relevant policies is currently unknown. This article evaluates the current construction waste recycling policies from three different stakeholders: the government, enterprises, and universities. The coordination degree between three different stakeholders reflects the effectiveness of the policy. 158 online questionnaires were distributed, of which including 19 measures, and 132 valid responses were received. After sorting out the collected questionnaire data and importing it into the SPSS software, using the Kruskal–Wallis H test method, analyzed the coordination degree of the government, enterprises and universities on the same measure and their differences (expressed by P). The study results show that there are differences in the degree of recognition of the same measure between different stakeholders, which may be caused by the different nature of work. There are two “good coordinated measures”, which are “50% reduction in value-added tax” and “establishment Recycling quality standards”; 8 items are “moderate coordination”, including “achieve source emission reduction”, “land preferential use”, “information platform construction”, etc. There are 9 items that are “poor coordination”, including “establish classification standards”, “Who generates who pays”, “Regular release of resource utilization product price information”, etc. This study can provide a reference for improving the efficiency of construction waste resource management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyu Huang & Hong Lang & Mingxue Ma, 2021. "Analysis of the Coordination Degree of the Construction Waste Recycling Policy Among Different Stakeholders," Springer Books, in: Xinhai Lu & Zuo Zhang & Weisheng Lu & Yi Peng (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 409-425, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-3587-8_27
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-3587-8_27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.