IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-10-2459-7_40.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

De-administration of the Community Resident’s Committee: A Case Study Based on the Fieldwork in China

In: Handbook of Chinese Management

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Chen

    (Beijing Normal University)

Abstract

With the start of a new round of community reform in China, the issue of administration and de-administration of the residents’ committee has once again become a hot topic. Based on the observation of the practical cases in different parts of China, this chapter summarizes three institutional models of community de-administration reform and reveals each model’s policy connotation, development course, main features, and operational effects. There are three main modes: first, “separation of residents’ committee and community workstation model,” focusing on organizational function segmentation; second, “cancel the street office and strengthen the community model,” focusing on power structure reorganization; and third, “administrative access system of community work model,” focusing on the establishment of community power list. The key to the reform of community de-administration is to excavate, cultivate, and release the social factors and mechanisms that the resident’s committee has long been restrained by the administration and to rebuild and reconstruct the balance between the “administrative” and “social” dual attributes of the residents’ committee.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Chen, 2023. "De-administration of the Community Resident’s Committee: A Case Study Based on the Fieldwork in China," Springer Books, in: Check-Teck Foo (ed.), Handbook of Chinese Management, chapter 38, pages 483-494, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-10-2459-7_40
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2459-7_40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-10-2459-7_40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.