Author
Abstract
Anderson collects Iris data. That consists of three species as follows: setosa, versicolor, and virginica. Each species has four variables and 50 cases. Because Fisher evaluates Fisher’s LDF with these data, such data are very popular for the evaluation of discriminant functions. Therefore, we call these data, “Fisher’s Iris data.” Because we can easily separate setosa from virginica and vercicolor through a scatter plot, we usually discriminate two classes, such as the virginica and vercicolor. In this book, our main policy of discrimination consists of two parts: (1) Discriminate the original data by six MP-based LDFs, QDF, and RDA in addition to two statistical LDFs. LINGO solves six MP-based LDFs, such as Revised IP-OLDF, Revised LP-OLDF, Revised IPLP-OLDF, two S-SVMs, and H-SVM explained in Sect. 2.3.3. Downloading a free version of LINGO with manual from LINDO Systems Inc. allows anyone to analyze data. JMP discriminates data by QDF and RDA, in addition to two LDFs, such as Fisher’s LDF and logistic regression. We evaluate nine discriminant functions by NM, except for H-SVM. (2) Generate resampling samples from the original data and discriminate such resampling samples by the 100-fold cross-validation for small sample method (Method 1). We compare five MP-based LDFs and two statistical LDFs by the mean of error rates of the validation sample (M2), and the 95 % CI of discriminant coefficients. We explain the LINGO Program 2 of the Method 1 in Chap. 9 . Because there is a small difference among seven NMs by LINGO Program 1 in Section 2.3.3, with the exception of H-SVM, and we cannot evaluate the ranking of seven LDFs clearly, we should no longer use Iris data to evaluate discriminant functions. Fisher proposed Fisher’s LDF under Fisher’s assumption. However, there are no actual test statistics to determine whether the data satisfy Fisher’s assumption. If the data satisfy Fisher’s assumption, NM of Fisher’s LDF continues to converge on MNM. Although there is no actual test for Fisher’s assumption, we can confirm it by this idea. Section 2.3.3 describes a LINGO Program 1 of six MP-based LDFs that discriminate conventional data.
Suggested Citation
Shuichi Shinmura, 2016.
"Iris Data and Fisher’s Assumption,"
Springer Books, in: New Theory of Discriminant Analysis After R. Fisher, chapter 0, pages 37-55,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-10-2164-0_2
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2164-0_2
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-10-2164-0_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.