IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-94-011-2868-1_85.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Comparison of Methods Used to Study Food Habits of Large African Carnivores

In: Wildlife 2001: Populations

Author

Listed:
  • M. G. L. Mills

    (National Parks Board)

Abstract

Five methods for studying food habits of large African carnivores are evaluated. Fecal analysis is useful for a basic description of the diet, provided that an adequate sample of scats can be obtained. However, it is impossible to quantify the amount eaten and to determine the proportions of killed versus scavenged food. Tracking spoor in restricted habitats is useful for most species, except the brown hyena (Hyaena brunnea). Opportunistic, and for most species, radio-location observations are biased towards large prey animals, because small animals are eaten quickly, leaving no trace. However, the data can be used to study sex and age selection of adult prey. Direct observations provide accurate measurements of consumption rates, killing frequency, and prey selection, provided they can be carried out without disturbing predator or prey. Mixing data from incompatible techniques must be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • M. G. L. Mills, 1992. "A Comparison of Methods Used to Study Food Habits of Large African Carnivores," Springer Books, in: Dale R. McCullough & Reginald H. Barrett (ed.), Wildlife 2001: Populations, pages 1112-1124, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-011-2868-1_85
    DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-011-2868-1_85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.