Author
Listed:
- Bruce W. Grant
(Savannah River Ecology Laboratory)
- Anton D. Tucker
(Savannah River Ecology Laboratory)
- Jeffrey E. Lovich
(Savannah River Ecology Laboratory)
- Anthony M. Mills
(Savannah River Ecology Laboratory)
- Philip M. Dixon
(Savannah River Ecology Laboratory)
- J. Whitfield Gibbons
(Savannah River Ecology Laboratory)
Abstract
Reptiles and amphibians play important roles in ecological communities and can be extremely sensitive indicators of environmental change, despite their cryptic and secretive habits. To estimate herpetofaunal community dynamics potentially attributable to either natural or anthropogenic environmental variation, herpetofaunal biodiversity managers will require specific, standardized, and efficient field sampling methods. One such method involves using arrays of wood and tin coverboards and is the subject of this paper. Studies were conducted on the Savannah River Site in the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina from January 1988 to August 1991. Compared with a drift fence/pitfall trap array, the coverboard technique requires less maintenance and sampling effort, but only those reptiles and amphibians using the coverboards at the time of an array check could be encountered. In contrast, live-trapping methods integrate over a longer time period and thereby generate many more encounters per trap. Nonetheless, large numbers of encounters with cryptic reptiles and amphibians can result from coverboard sampling depending upon the study site, coverboard age, time of day, and type of coverboard (i.e., wood or tin). Detailed analyses of hydric and thermal microclimates beneath coverboards suggest specific mechanisms to explain observed differences in herpetofaunal coverboard use. We conclude that the coverboard technique can provide a useful means to quantify patterns in herpetofaunal relative abundance and biodiversity. However, array design and sampling protocol should be carefully selected to minimize sampling biases in encounter probabilities due to subtle differences among herpetofauna in their hygrothermal microclimate preferences.
Suggested Citation
Bruce W. Grant & Anton D. Tucker & Jeffrey E. Lovich & Anthony M. Mills & Philip M. Dixon & J. Whitfield Gibbons, 1992.
"The Use of Coverboards in Estimating Patterns of Reptile and Amphibian Biodiversity,"
Springer Books, in: Dale R. McCullough & Reginald H. Barrett (ed.), Wildlife 2001: Populations, pages 379-403,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-011-2868-1_31
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_31
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-011-2868-1_31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.